Deep Dive Podcast 4: The Election Cover-Up

Going Further Than Post 8 and Deeper Than the Series So Far

This episode marks a shift.

While earlier podcast episodes expanded on the written posts, Podcast 4 goes further—not just adding detail, but connecting evidence across the series and into developments unfolding right now.

Post 8 focused on Trump’s call to “find 11,780 votes.” This deep dive podcast episode places that call within a broader pattern—and examines why continuing to soften the language around what followed no longer reflects the evidence.

If you’ve read Post 8, you might think you know where this episode goes. You don’t.

If you’ve listened to past podcasts, you might think you know where this episode goes. You don’t.

Some of what’s discussed didn’t make it into the article—not because it wasn’t important, but because it required more space, more context, and a level of synthesis that only a long-form conversation allows.

In this episode, I walk through:

· Why Post 8 was unusually difficult to write

· How the Georgia call fits into a larger pattern of interference and concealment

· Why institutional language choices matter—especially when accountability is delayed

· And why a case many assume is “old news” has become strategically relevant again

The podcast also includes developments that emerged after Post 8 was published, including legal updates and expert analysis that materially change how this moment should be understood.

You’ll also hear an audio clip from the Main Justice podcast, where Andrew Weissmann and Mary McCord explain and help us understand why the Mar-a-Lago classified documents case—and Volume Two of Jack Smith’s report—remain unresolved in ways that matter right now.

This is not a quick listen. It’s an intentional one.

Cover-ups don’t usually rely on a single dramatic moment. They rely on fragmentation: pieces separated, stories isolated, details buried just far enough apart that no one is encouraged to connect them. This conversation is about what happens when you do connect them.

If you’re short on time, the article stands on its own.
If you want to understand what’s being hidden—and how—I invite you to listen.

As always, I encourage you to approach this whole series with curiosity and critical thinking. The goal isn’t to replace one narrative with another, but to look directly at what’s been obscured and decide, carefully, what it means in the bigger picture.

That understanding matters—not just for interpreting the past, but for preparing for the future. As we approach the 2026 midterms, the question isn’t who wins or loses, but whether votes are counted accurately and transparently at all.

Thank you for reading, listening, and sharing this work.
— Alison

New Here? Want a Clear Way to Navigate the Series?

This investigation is designed to be read — and listened to — in layers.
You don’t need to start at the beginning, and you don’t need to consume everything in order.

Here’s how the series is structured, how to navigate it easily — and where to find the source material behind it.

The 2024 Election Series — Written Investigation

Posts 1 & 2 — The Teaser / Trailer (and Research Foundation)

Posts 1 and 2 are not where the case-by-case evidence begins — but they are where the foundation is laid.

These opening posts preview the vulnerabilities, patterns, and unanswered questions that prompted this investigation, offering glimpses of what was uncovered before the series moves into detailed documentation.

Just as importantly, Posts 1 and 2 include extensive reference sections that point to the public records, reporting, court filings, government statements, and expert analysis this series is built on.

If you want to see the sourcing behind this work—and understand how these conclusions were reached—the reference sections at the end of Posts 1 and 2 are the best place to start.

· Post 1 — Introduction to the Election Series (Part 1)

· Post 2 — Introduction (Part 2): They Knew, But What Did They Do?

Where the Investigation Truly Begins

Starting with Post 3, the series moves from preview and context into documented cases, specific anomalies, and identifiable patterns across states and election systems.

Each post builds on sourced material and links back to original reporting, records, and prior findings.

· Post 3 — Red Flags in the Voter Rolls

· Post 4 — Is Russian Malware Still in Our Registration Systems?

· Post 5 — How Can 1 in 10 Votes Be Deleted Without Anyone Noticing?

· Post 6 — How I Uncovered Florida’s “Two Sets of Books”

· Post 7 — Ghost Voters — Who Is Harry Jhonson?

· Post 8 — Trump’s Georgia Call Was Never Just About “11,780 Votes” — It Was About Voter Records

Each post stands on its own.
Together, they reveal a pattern that only becomes visible when these sources are examined side by side.

Deep Dive Podcast Series (Companion, Not Recap)

The written posts are where the documentation lives—source material, citations, timelines, and case detail.
The Deep Dive podcast is where we slow down, examine meaning, and connect what is often kept separate.

· Podcast 1 — Russia’s 10% Voter Deletion Tool (Posts 1–5)

· Podcast 2 — How I Discovered Florida’s Two Sets of Books (Post 6)

· Podcast 3 — Ghost Voters: Who Is Harry Jhonson? (Post 7)

· Podcast 4 — The Election Cover-Up (Listen to the podcast above)
(Builds on Post 8, connects the full series, and incorporates developments unfolding now)

Earlier episodes expanded on individual posts.
Podcast 4 marks a shift—it connects evidence across the series and into the present.

Where Should You Start?

· Want to review the source material → start with the reference sections in Posts 1 & 2

· Prefer reading documented cases → start with Post 3

· Prefer listening and context → start with Podcast 1

· Want to understand why language is changing now → start here, with Podcast 4

There’s no wrong entry point.

What Comes Next

This series isn’t just about exposing what’s been happening.
It’s about what comes after understanding.

You can’t solve a problem you don’t fully understand—but understanding alone isn’t enough. Real change requires thoughtful, strategic action.

In Podcast 4, we begin introducing ideas for immediate action—not slogans or shortcuts, but practical ways people can respond when institutions delay accountability, soften language, or do nothing at all.

Future posts and podcast episodes will continue building on that foundation:

· translating evidence into clarity

· clarity into strategy

· and strategy into actions that can help protect the integrity of the 2026 midterms

This work is about understanding first—and then acting deliberately, together.

If you’ve ever asked, “What can we actually do?” — stay with us. That question is central to where this series is going.